The best indicator for Moody's Corporation (MCO)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Moody's Corporation (MCO) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Moody's Corporation (MCO) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Markov Regime
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Moody's Corporation (MCO) over ~31.6 years — beating buy-and-hold by 2.5% CAGR.
Moody's Corporation (MCO) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Moody's Corporation (MCO) — trailing buy-and-hold by 3.0% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Markov Regime ✓ | Daily | 16.9% | 0.68 | -70.7% | 72.5% | 247 | 2.5% |
| 2 | Vegas Tunnel ✓ | Daily | 11.6% | 0.66 | -31.2% | 48.7% | 76 | -2.8% |
| 3 | ZLEMA 200 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 10.8% | 0.66 | -36.2% | 61.3% | 31 | -3.7% |
| 4 | Trend-Gated Asymmetric ✓ | Weekly | 9.1% | 0.65 | -28.3% | 74.2% | 31 | -5.3% |
| 5 | TRIMA 100 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 11.9% | 0.64 | -40.0% | 55.0% | 20 | -2.5% |
| 6 | CCI (100) ✓ | Weekly | 12.6% | 0.64 | -40.0% | 52.4% | 21 | -1.8% |
| 7 | Lorentzian Classification ✓ | Weekly | 13.0% | 0.63 | -43.1% | 56.7% | 252 | -1.4% |
| 8 | Volatility Regime (VIX-style) ✓ | Weekly | 8.6% | 0.63 | -33.5% | 67.4% | 46 | -5.8% |
| 9 | EMA Cascade Rider ✓ | Weekly | 10.7% | 0.61 | -45.2% | 68.2% | 22 | -3.7% |
| 10 | MA Ribbon ✓ | Weekly | 9.8% | 0.6 | -32.1% | 65.6% | 32 | -4.6% |
| 11 | Std Error Channel ✓ | Weekly | 9.9% | 0.6 | -36.1% | 59.7% | 62 | -4.5% |
| 12 | EMA 100 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 11.4% | 0.6 | -42.4% | 46.7% | 30 | -3.0% |
| 13 | LSMA 200 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 9.7% | 0.6 | -36.2% | 65.7% | 35 | -4.7% |
| 14 | Disparity (100) ✓ | Weekly | 11.5% | 0.6 | -42.4% | 46.7% | 30 | -3.0% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Moody's Corporation (MCO)
1 of 666 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Moody's Corporation (MCO) outright. Another 416 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 211 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lorentzian Classification | 1 | none needed | 2.81× |
| Sine-Weighted MA | — | 2.39× | 3.18× |
| Chandelier Exit | — | 1.41× | 2.99× |
| Chande Momentum Osc. | — | 1.51× | 3.79× |
| QQE | — | 1.51× | 2.13× |
| Trend Regularity Adaptive MA | — | 1.6× | 3.23× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Moody's Corporation (MCO), Markov Regime on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Moody's Corporation’s signal flips
We track Moody's Corporation daily. Its backtested best indicator, Markov Regime (Daily), is long right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.