The best indicator for Keysight Technologies (KEYS)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Keysight Technologies (KEYS) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where Keysight Technologies (KEYS) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Zero-Lag LSMA
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Keysight Technologies (KEYS) over ~12.0 years — trailing buy-and-hold by 3.8% CAGR.
Keysight Technologies (KEYS) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Keysight Technologies (KEYS) — trailing buy-and-hold by 15.4% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zero-Lag LSMA ✓ | Weekly | 19.4% | 0.93 | -28.6% | 62.9% | 35 | -3.8% |
| 2 | McGinley Dynamic ✓ | Weekly | 20.8% | 0.83 | -32.0% | 50.0% | 18 | -2.4% |
| 3 | Adaptive Supertrend ✓ | Weekly | 19.5% | 0.83 | -25.3% | 75.0% | 16 | -3.7% |
| 4 | McGinley 10/30 Cross ✓ | Daily | 19.2% | 0.81 | -29.2% | 61.1% | 18 | -4.6% |
| 5 | Twiggs Money Flow ✓ | Weekly | 18.6% | 0.79 | -26.7% | 55.9% | 34 | -4.6% |
| 6 | Kaufman Adaptive MA ✓ | Weekly | 18.2% | 0.78 | -30.1% | 48.5% | 33 | -5.1% |
| 7 | QQE ✓ | Weekly | 20.0% | 0.78 | -50.3% | 67.7% | 31 | -3.2% |
| 8 | G-Channel ✓ | Weekly | 18.4% | 0.77 | -50.7% | 50.0% | 16 | -4.8% |
| 9 | TRIMA 200 Trend ✓ | Daily | 16.0% | 0.76 | -46.1% | 26.1% | 23 | -7.8% |
| 10 | Elastic VW MA ✓ | Weekly | 17.8% | 0.76 | -41.4% | 44.0% | 25 | -5.4% |
| 11 | Disparity (50) ✓ | Weekly | 17.4% | 0.76 | -54.8% | 36.8% | 19 | -5.8% |
| 12 | McGinley 100 Trend ✓ | Daily | 19.8% | 0.75 | -41.6% | 29.4% | 17 | -4.1% |
| 13 | SSL Channel ✓ | Weekly | 16.3% | 0.75 | -28.3% | 58.3% | 24 | -6.9% |
| 14 | Trend Magic ✓ | Weekly | 17.4% | 0.75 | -29.1% | 62.5% | 32 | -5.8% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Keysight Technologies (KEYS)
27 of 510 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Keysight Technologies (KEYS) outright. Another 249 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 135 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zero-Lag LSMA | 1 | 1.07× | 4.45× |
| Chande Kroll Stop | 1 | 1.43× | 3.16× |
| Twiggs Money Flow | 1 | 1.6× | 3.45× |
| Markov Regime (Confirmed) | 1 | 1.74× | 3.0× |
| Trend Magic | 1 | 1.87× | 4.1× |
| Zero-Lag EMA Cross | 1 | 1.98× | 4.16× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Keysight Technologies (KEYS), Zero-Lag LSMA on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It still trailed buy-and-hold on raw return — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Keysight Technologies’s signal flips
We track Keysight Technologies daily. Its backtested best indicator, Zero-Lag LSMA (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.