The best indicator for Invesco (IVZ)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Invesco (IVZ) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Invesco (IVZ) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
EMA 13/48 Cross
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Invesco (IVZ) over ~30.7 years — beating buy-and-hold by 3.4% CAGR.
Invesco (IVZ) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Invesco (IVZ) — trailing buy-and-hold by 2.6% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EMA 13/48 Cross ✓ | Daily | 11.1% | 0.53 | -49.7% | 39.3% | 84 | 3.4% |
| 2 | Smoothed Heikin-Ashi ✓ | Weekly | 9.5% | 0.49 | -46.2% | 45.6% | 103 | 1.8% |
| 3 | STARC Bands ✓ | Weekly | 6.6% | 0.48 | -37.3% | 54.2% | 24 | -1.1% |
| 4 | SMC: Fair Value Gap ✓ | Weekly | 9.3% | 0.48 | -53.0% | 43.8% | 80 | 1.6% |
| 5 | McGinley 100 Trend ✓ | Daily | 10.8% | 0.47 | -64.2% | 38.7% | 75 | 3.1% |
| 6 | Supertrend (7,3) ✓ | Daily | 9.5% | 0.47 | -55.7% | 48.1% | 133 | 1.7% |
| 7 | T3 (Tillson) ✓ | Weekly | 9.3% | 0.47 | -54.2% | 42.5% | 106 | 1.6% |
| 8 | Ichimoku (fast) ✓ | Weekly | 9.0% | 0.47 | -59.1% | 52.3% | 65 | 1.3% |
| 9 | J_TPO ✓ | Weekly | 8.2% | 0.47 | -53.6% | 37.0% | 92 | 0.5% |
| 10 | WMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Daily | 9.2% | 0.46 | -60.4% | 49.0% | 98 | 1.5% |
| 11 | Supertrend (14,4) ✓ | Daily | 9.4% | 0.46 | -60.8% | 51.7% | 89 | 1.6% |
| 12 | EMA 15/60 Cross ✓ | Daily | 9.1% | 0.46 | -60.2% | 34.8% | 69 | 1.3% |
| 13 | Bollinger Breakout ✓ | Weekly | 7.1% | 0.46 | -53.2% | 48.0% | 25 | -0.6% |
| 14 | Arnaud Legoux MA ✓ | Weekly | 9.0% | 0.46 | -48.5% | 47.8% | 138 | 1.3% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Invesco (IVZ)
344 of 676 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Invesco (IVZ) outright. Another 61 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 59 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI Trend (>50) | 2 | none needed | 1.98× |
| Hull MA Trend | 2 | none needed | 1.73× |
| TEMA 20/50 Cross | 2 | none needed | 1.75× |
| Ichimoku Cloud | 2 | none needed | 2.1× |
| Coppock Curve | 2 | none needed | 1.85× |
| Chande Momentum Osc. | 2 | none needed | 2.1× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Invesco (IVZ), EMA 13/48 Cross on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Invesco’s signal flips
We track Invesco daily. Its backtested best indicator, EMA 13/48 Cross (Daily), is long right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.