The best indicator for Halliburton (HAL)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Halliburton (HAL) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Halliburton (HAL) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
FRAMA 100 Trend
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Halliburton (HAL) over ~54.0 years — beating buy-and-hold by 5.1% CAGR.
Halliburton (HAL) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Halliburton (HAL) — beating buy-and-hold by 0.5% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FRAMA 100 Trend ✓ | Daily | 11.6% | 0.55 | -50.3% | 39.3% | 1148 | 5.1% |
| 2 | Accumulation Swing Index ✓ | Daily | 10.7% | 0.51 | -69.5% | 44.0% | 2956 | 4.1% |
| 3 | Swing Index ✓ | Daily | 10.7% | 0.51 | -69.5% | 44.0% | 2956 | 4.1% |
| 4 | TRIX (21) ✓ | Daily | 9.7% | 0.49 | -65.5% | 54.5% | 101 | 3.1% |
| 5 | TSI (13,7) ✓ | Weekly | 9.8% | 0.49 | -55.5% | 52.9% | 70 | 3.3% |
| 6 | Ehlers SuperSmoother ✓ | Daily | 9.7% | 0.48 | -70.1% | 40.7% | 1836 | 3.1% |
| 7 | Chande Momentum Osc. ✓ | Weekly | 9.7% | 0.48 | -52.9% | 52.6% | 192 | 3.2% |
| 8 | Price Volume Trend ✓ | Weekly | 10.0% | 0.48 | -61.0% | 50.8% | 130 | 3.5% |
| 9 | Camarilla Pivots ✓ | Weekly | 9.8% | 0.48 | -91.0% | 51.7% | 592 | 3.3% |
| 10 | Rainbow MA ✓ | Daily | 9.7% | 0.48 | -67.2% | 41.0% | 1545 | 3.1% |
| 11 | Price Volume Trend ✓ | Daily | 9.6% | 0.47 | -70.2% | 39.7% | 620 | 3.0% |
| 12 | Woodie Pivots ✓ | Daily | 9.7% | 0.47 | -70.5% | 43.1% | 2896 | 3.1% |
| 13 | PMax ✓ | Daily | 9.2% | 0.47 | -53.9% | 53.1% | 81 | 2.6% |
| 14 | EMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Daily | 8.9% | 0.46 | -54.4% | 46.1% | 115 | 2.3% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Halliburton (HAL)
450 of 727 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Halliburton (HAL) outright. Another 70 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 66 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sine-Weighted MA | 4 | none needed | 2.09× |
| MACD | 2 | none needed | 1.89× |
| RSI Trend (>50) | 2 | none needed | 2.21× |
| Rate of Change | 2 | none needed | 2.06× |
| EMA-10 Trend | 2 | none needed | 1.86× |
| Donchian Midline | 2 | none needed | 2.36× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Halliburton (HAL), FRAMA 100 Trend on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Halliburton’s signal flips
We track Halliburton daily. Its backtested best indicator, FRAMA 100 Trend (Daily), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.