The best indicator for Expedia Group (EXPE)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Expedia Group (EXPE) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where Expedia Group (EXPE) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
DEMA 10/30 Cross
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Expedia Group (EXPE) over ~21.3 years — beating buy-and-hold by 4.3% CAGR.
Expedia Group (EXPE) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Expedia Group (EXPE) — trailing buy-and-hold by 3.2% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DEMA 10/30 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 14.7% | 0.63 | -59.0% | 59.3% | 27 | 4.3% |
| 2 | Stochastic ✓ | Daily | 14.6% | 0.6 | -72.9% | 75.2% | 105 | 4.0% |
| 3 | Hull MA 20/80 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 13.8% | 0.6 | -46.9% | 66.7% | 21 | 3.5% |
| 4 | TEMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 12.6% | 0.58 | -44.9% | 50.0% | 20 | 2.2% |
| 5 | Price Momentum Oscillator ✓ | Weekly | 13.6% | 0.58 | -53.5% | 53.6% | 28 | 3.3% |
| 6 | TRIX ✓ | Weekly | 12.5% | 0.56 | -67.5% | 53.8% | 26 | 2.1% |
| 7 | Waddah Attar Explosion ✓ | Weekly | 8.4% | 0.56 | -34.9% | 50.0% | 58 | -2.0% |
| 8 | Ehlers Roofing Filter ✓ | Weekly | 12.9% | 0.55 | -48.2% | 63.2% | 19 | 2.5% |
| 9 | Chaikin Volatility ✓ | Weekly | 9.5% | 0.55 | -33.4% | 57.4% | 68 | -0.9% |
| 10 | CCI ✓ | Daily | 12.0% | 0.54 | -73.5% | 76.1% | 109 | 1.4% |
| 11 | McGinley 100 Trend ✓ | Daily | 13.7% | 0.52 | -70.5% | 25.0% | 16 | 3.1% |
| 12 | T3 20/80 Cross ✓ | Daily | 11.8% | 0.52 | -50.4% | 57.7% | 26 | 1.2% |
| 13 | Percentage Price Osc. ✓ | Weekly | 11.0% | 0.51 | -62.9% | 46.3% | 41 | 0.7% |
| 14 | Hull Suite ✓ | Weekly | 11.1% | 0.51 | -52.6% | 59.1% | 22 | 0.8% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Expedia Group (EXPE)
38 of 606 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Expedia Group (EXPE) outright. Another 156 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 241 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Least Squares MA | 2 | none needed | 2.87× |
| Zero-Lag LSMA | 1 | 1.03× | 2.7× |
| Trade Volume Index | 1 | 1.25× | 2.82× |
| QQE | 1 | 1.39× | 1.66× |
| UT Bot (ATR Trailing) | 1 | 1.47× | 2.06× |
| Hull MA 100 Trend | 1 | 1.79× | 3.17× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Expedia Group (EXPE), DEMA 10/30 Cross on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Expedia Group’s signal flips
We track Expedia Group daily. Its backtested best indicator, DEMA 10/30 Cross (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.