The best indicator for Everest Group (EG)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Everest Group (EG) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where Everest Group (EG) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Demand Index
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Everest Group (EG) over ~31.1 years — beating buy-and-hold by 1.6% CAGR.
Everest Group (EG) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Everest Group (EG) — trailing buy-and-hold by 3.1% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Demand Index ✓ | Weekly | 13.2% | 0.72 | -37.0% | 71.1% | 97 | 1.6% |
| 2 | Holy Grail Confluence ✓ | Daily | 11.3% | 0.71 | -39.6% | 82.4% | 51 | -0.3% |
| 3 | MA Envelope ✓ | Daily | 11.2% | 0.67 | -37.5% | 72.1% | 197 | -0.5% |
| 4 | Connors RSI-2 ✓ | Weekly | 9.7% | 0.67 | -30.1% | 67.6% | 74 | -1.9% |
| 5 | Laguerre RSI ✓ | Daily | 8.7% | 0.65 | -30.8% | 68.7% | 233 | -2.9% |
| 6 | MA Envelope ✓ | Weekly | 10.7% | 0.62 | -34.5% | 68.8% | 77 | -0.9% |
| 7 | Keltner Mean-Reversion ✓ | Daily | 7.6% | 0.57 | -36.7% | 76.1% | 92 | -4.1% |
| 8 | Stochastic ✓ | Daily | 9.6% | 0.56 | -40.8% | 75.5% | 151 | -2.0% |
| 9 | DeMarker ✓ | Daily | 8.7% | 0.54 | -35.9% | 75.5% | 102 | -2.9% |
| 10 | Ichimoku TK Cross ✓ | Weekly | 8.4% | 0.53 | -32.8% | 54.3% | 35 | -3.1% |
| 11 | FRAMA 10/30 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 8.5% | 0.53 | -41.4% | 53.7% | 108 | -3.0% |
| 12 | Bollinger Mean-Reversion ✓ | Daily | 7.4% | 0.52 | -36.2% | 72.3% | 130 | -4.2% |
| 13 | Stochastic Momentum Index ✓ | Daily | 7.2% | 0.52 | -35.7% | 70.2% | 131 | -4.4% |
| 14 | Fibonacci Bands ✓ | Daily | 7.4% | 0.52 | -36.2% | 72.3% | 130 | -4.2% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Everest Group (EG)
28 of 682 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Everest Group (EG) outright. Another 19 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 20 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCI | 2 | none needed | 4.97× |
| Connors RSI-2 | 2 | none needed | 3.42× |
| MA Envelope | 2 | none needed | 2.81× |
| Demand Index | 2 | none needed | 2.63× |
| FRAMA 10/30 Cross | 1 | 1.13× | 3.39× |
| Connors RSI | 1 | 1.52× | 3.01× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Everest Group (EG), Demand Index on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Everest Group’s signal flips
We track Everest Group daily. Its backtested best indicator, Demand Index (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.