The best indicator for CBRE Group (CBRE)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real CBRE Group (CBRE) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where CBRE Group (CBRE) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
DMI Direction
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for CBRE Group (CBRE) over ~22.4 years — beating buy-and-hold by 6.3% CAGR.
CBRE Group (CBRE) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for CBRE Group (CBRE) — trailing buy-and-hold by 8.1% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DMI Direction ✓ | Weekly | 20.8% | 0.85 | -34.1% | 52.8% | 36 | 6.3% |
| 2 | Instantaneous Trendline ✓ | Weekly | 21.0% | 0.84 | -36.6% | 48.8% | 41 | 6.5% |
| 3 | KAMA 30 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 20.1% | 0.83 | -28.0% | 50.0% | 38 | 5.6% |
| 4 | Relative Volatility Index ✓ | Weekly | 20.2% | 0.8 | -39.4% | 49.2% | 59 | 5.6% |
| 5 | DeMarker (14) ✓ | Weekly | 19.3% | 0.8 | -36.4% | 57.1% | 49 | 4.8% |
| 6 | TSI (13,7) ✓ | Weekly | 18.5% | 0.77 | -28.7% | 56.7% | 30 | 4.0% |
| 7 | Trade Volume Index ✓ | Weekly | 19.2% | 0.77 | -36.5% | 61.4% | 57 | 4.7% |
| 8 | Volume-Weighted EMA ✓ | Weekly | 18.3% | 0.74 | -34.4% | 49.2% | 63 | 3.8% |
| 9 | On-Balance Volume ✓ | Weekly | 17.5% | 0.73 | -38.6% | 52.2% | 69 | 3.0% |
| 10 | Ease of Movement ✓ | Weekly | 17.4% | 0.73 | -41.3% | 49.0% | 49 | 2.8% |
| 11 | SMC: Break of Structure ✓ | Daily | 18.6% | 0.72 | -52.2% | 60.7% | 56 | 3.9% |
| 12 | Momentum ✓ | Weekly | 17.4% | 0.72 | -37.1% | 60.5% | 76 | 2.8% |
| 13 | Force Index ✓ | Weekly | 16.7% | 0.72 | -37.7% | 47.1% | 68 | 2.1% |
| 14 | Price Volume Trend ✓ | Weekly | 17.5% | 0.72 | -35.9% | 48.1% | 52 | 3.0% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on CBRE Group (CBRE)
30 of 613 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on CBRE Group (CBRE) outright. Another 355 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 136 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zero-Lag MACD | 2 | none needed | 2.72× |
| DeMarker (14) | 2 | none needed | 3.09× |
| QQE | 1 | 1.1× | 2.37× |
| Ease of Movement | 1 | 1.17× | 3.13× |
| FRAMA 10/30 Cross | 1 | 1.17× | 2.76× |
| CCI (30) | 1 | 1.33× | 3.41× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For CBRE Group (CBRE), DMI Direction on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when CBRE Group’s signal flips
We track CBRE Group daily. Its backtested best indicator, DMI Direction (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.