The best indicator for Amphenol (APH)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Amphenol (APH) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where Amphenol (APH) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Negative Volume Index
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Amphenol (APH) over ~34.9 years — trailing buy-and-hold by 2.4% CAGR.
Amphenol (APH) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Amphenol (APH) — trailing buy-and-hold by 12.4% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Negative Volume Index ✓ | Daily | 20.6% | 0.89 | -38.2% | 51.5% | 66 | -2.4% |
| 2 | Linear Regression Slope ✓ | Weekly | 18.4% | 0.78 | -49.6% | 61.9% | 42 | -4.5% |
| 3 | Correlation Trend ✓ | Weekly | 18.4% | 0.78 | -49.6% | 61.9% | 42 | -4.5% |
| 4 | CCI (200) ✓ | Daily | 18.3% | 0.76 | -56.8% | 36.6% | 93 | -4.6% |
| 5 | SMA 200 Trend ✓ | Daily | 17.4% | 0.75 | -48.9% | 39.3% | 112 | -5.6% |
| 6 | McGinley Dynamic ✓ | Weekly | 20.3% | 0.75 | -60.6% | 50.0% | 44 | -2.5% |
| 7 | Markov Regime ✓ | Weekly | 21.2% | 0.75 | -62.0% | 75.0% | 36 | -1.6% |
| 8 | Coppock Curve ✓ | Weekly | 17.1% | 0.74 | -67.2% | 57.1% | 35 | -5.8% |
| 9 | EMA 8/21 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 16.9% | 0.73 | -67.5% | 54.8% | 31 | -5.9% |
| 10 | Coral Trend ✓ | Weekly | 17.3% | 0.73 | -58.3% | 63.9% | 36 | -5.6% |
| 11 | Ehlers Stochastic ✓ | Weekly | 17.2% | 0.73 | -51.1% | 62.5% | 40 | -5.7% |
| 12 | Williams %R (50) ✓ | Weekly | 17.4% | 0.73 | -57.8% | 47.8% | 46 | -5.5% |
| 13 | VIDYA 200 Trend ✓ | Daily | 20.2% | 0.72 | -70.4% | 36.4% | 22 | -2.8% |
| 14 | TRIX (9) ✓ | Weekly | 16.8% | 0.72 | -51.9% | 69.0% | 29 | -6.1% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Amphenol (APH)
0 of 672 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Amphenol (APH) outright. Another 439 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 215 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sine-Weighted MA | — | 2.08× | 2.92× |
| QQE | — | 1.34× | 2.43× |
| McGinley Dynamic | — | 1.46× | 3.28× |
| Williams %R (50) | — | 1.57× | 3.62× |
| G-Channel | — | 1.65× | 2.85× |
| Chandelier Exit | — | 1.67× | 2.92× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Amphenol (APH), Negative Volume Index on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It still trailed buy-and-hold on raw return — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Amphenol’s signal flips
We track Amphenol daily. Its backtested best indicator, Negative Volume Index (Daily), is long right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.