Does anything beat buy & hold on Live Cattle (LE)?
Every setup we tested on Live Cattle (LE) — ranked out-of-sample, corrected for multiple testing, and forward-tracked in public from the day this page published. The honest answer is the headline.
No setup beat simply holding once tested honestly. We say so plainly.
Its best setup trailed buy-and-hold out-of-sample. Buy-and-hold benchmark: +4.6% CAGR over 25.3 years (+10.2% CAGR in the out-of-sample window).
Educational research from historical backtests — not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.
Live Cattle: Nothing Survived Honest Testing
We ran 756 indicator setups against Live Cattle (LE), and none earned a pass. Macro instruments like this are hard terrain for timing systems: roll costs quietly tax every position, returns arrive in regime-driven bursts separated by long flat stretches, and a rule tuned to one macro environment tends to break in the next. The best-looking candidate, Volume Oscillator on the weekly timeframe, looked strong in-sample — which is exactly what you'd expect from the winner of hundreds of tries — and then failed to hold up on data it had never seen.
Read the numbers with the selection problem in mind. When you pick the best of 756 attempts, luck alone produces impressive backtests, so we require an out-of-sample Sharpe above a multiple-testing hurdle of 1.32. Here the top setup managed 1.09, with out-of-sample alpha of -2.4% against a buy-and-hold CAGR of +4.6%. Across all setups, only 1.9% beat holding at all. That's the finding for this window of history — markets change, and past results, good or bad, predict nothing.
Every figure above is computed from our own backtests — nothing is estimated or invented. Hypothetical results; not investment advice.
The least-bad setups — shown with their failure numbers
Nothing here earned a verdict — these are the best of a losing field, published so you can see exactly how "best" still failed.
Volume Oscillator
Mechanical rule (exactly as backtested): Long when volume momentum is positive and price is above its EMA. Signals are evaluated at weekly-bar close, the position changes on the NEXT bar, 0.08% cost per side, long/flat only — no leverage, no shorting.
Out-of-sample (last ~30% of the window, never used to pick this setup): Sharpe 1.09 · alpha -2.4% · 40 trades over 7.6 yrs.
T3 15/60 Cross
Mechanical rule (exactly as backtested): VARIANT — T3 15/60 cross; long while fast leads slow. Signals are evaluated at daily-bar close, the position changes on the NEXT bar, 0.08% cost per side, long/flat only — no leverage, no shorting.
Out-of-sample (last ~30% of the window, never used to pick this setup): Sharpe 1.01 · alpha +2.1% · 13 trades over 7.5 yrs.
Vortex (7)
Mechanical rule (exactly as backtested): Variant — fast Vortex(7); long while VI+ leads VI-. Signals are evaluated at weekly-bar close, the position changes on the NEXT bar, 0.08% cost per side, long/flat only — no leverage, no shorting.
Out-of-sample (last ~30% of the window, never used to pick this setup): Sharpe 1.01 · alpha +1.5% · 21 trades over 7.6 yrs.
Since publication — including if it loses
The forward record is just getting started — the gap between the two is the honest score. Marked to market nightly from real prices, rules frozen at publication, as of 2026-06-29. Currently FLAT.
We tested 756 setups (indicator × parameters × timeframe) on Live Cattle (LE). Only setups with ≥30 trades qualify (669 did). Setups are ranked by out-of-sample Sharpe — the last ~30% of history, which standard-parameter rules never saw during selection. Because picking the best of 756 tries mines even the holdout, the VALIDATED verdict additionally requires the top setup’s OOS Sharpe to clear a selection hurdle of 1.32 (√(2 ln N)/√T) AND positive alpha in both windows. Of the eligible setups, 1.9% had positive out-of-sample alpha (median OOS Sharpe 0.38) — the table below is truncated, but this summary covers all of them. Full recipe: methodology · the engine’s contract lives in the repo as STRATEGY_METHODOLOGY.md.
Top 20 of 669 eligible setups
Ranked by out-of-sample Sharpe. Full + out-of-sample columns, costs included. Hypothetical.
| # | Setup | TF | Total ret | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | α vs B&H | OOS Sharpe | OOS α | OOS trades |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Volume Oscillator | Weekly | +54.0% | 0.26 | -30.1% | 59.3% | 108 | -2.9% | 1.09 | -2.4% | 40 |
| 2 | T3 15/60 Cross | Daily | +431.6% | 0.6 | -28.7% | 68.3% | 41 | +2.3% | 1.01 | +2.1% | 13 |
| 3 | Vortex (7) | Weekly | +411.8% | 0.56 | -22.1% | 61.0% | 77 | +2.1% | 1.01 | +1.5% | 21 |
| 4 | Balance of Power | Weekly | +78.2% | 0.23 | -45.1% | 46.9% | 64 | -2.3% | 0.95 | +2.2% | 11 |
| 5 | Coppock (fast) | Weekly | +253.7% | 0.45 | -20.8% | 58.3% | 36 | +0.5% | 0.95 | +1.0% | 10 |
| 6 | Rate of Change | Weekly | +181.8% | 0.38 | -22.8% | 44.9% | 69 | -0.4% | 0.94 | +0.8% | 17 |
| 7 | Volume Zone Oscillator | Weekly | +163.5% | 0.37 | -31.8% | 58.2% | 98 | -0.7% | 0.94 | -0.8% | 33 |
| 8 | Ichimoku (fast) | Weekly | +229.2% | 0.44 | -20.4% | 51.0% | 49 | +0.2% | 0.89 | -1.0% | 17 |
| 9 | SMA 20/80 Cross | Daily | +283.3% | 0.48 | -20.0% | 58.5% | 41 | +0.9% | 0.86 | +0.3% | 13 |
| 10 | Hull MA 15/60 Cross | Weekly | +191.5% | 0.41 | -37.2% | 50.0% | 36 | -0.3% | 0.86 | -1.1% | 13 |
| 11 | Relative Volatility Index | Weekly | +57.5% | 0.2 | -38.5% | 46.2% | 91 | -2.8% | 0.85 | +1.6% | 17 |
| 12 | Klinger Oscillator | Weekly | +45.6% | 0.18 | -60.6% | 56.9% | 102 | -3.1% | 0.85 | -1.1% | 30 |
| 13 | TRIX (21) | Daily | +358.0% | 0.54 | -25.5% | 58.5% | 41 | +1.6% | 0.84 | +0.2% | 13 |
| 14 | Chande Momentum Osc. | Weekly | +186.0% | 0.38 | -27.5% | 54.8% | 93 | -0.4% | 0.84 | -0.7% | 24 |
| 15 | Momentum | Weekly | +196.3% | 0.4 | -26.0% | 49.4% | 79 | -0.2% | 0.84 | -0.9% | 23 |
| 16 | ROC (10) | Weekly | +196.3% | 0.4 | -26.0% | 49.4% | 79 | -0.2% | 0.84 | -0.9% | 23 |
| 17 | Momentum (10) | Weekly | +196.3% | 0.4 | -26.0% | 49.4% | 79 | -0.2% | 0.84 | -0.9% | 23 |
| 18 | MACD | Weekly | +206.3% | 0.42 | -33.4% | 56.5% | 46 | -0.1% | 0.84 | -1.7% | 17 |
| 19 | Markov Regime | Daily | +183.8% | 0.35 | -39.2% | 39.2% | 120 | -0.4% | 0.83 | +1.9% | 27 |
| 20 | Volume-Weighted EMA | Weekly | +55.3% | 0.2 | -39.3% | 50.0% | 74 | -2.8% | 0.83 | -0.4% | 16 |
Hypothetical backtests with 0.08%/side costs. Not investment advice — see the full disclaimer.
These are historical backtests of mechanical rules. They are educational research, not investment advice, not a recommendation, and not tailored to you. Educational information only — not investment advice. Hypothetical backtested results; past performance does not guarantee future results. Trading involves risk of loss.